- #WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY FULL#
- #WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY SOFTWARE#
- #WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY CODE#
- #WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY PLUS#
#WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY CODE#
Mind you dreamweaver does go to far and always seems to using its rendering engine even when you only ever use code view.
I’ve been there in the past where I’ve managed sites using textpad32 and a separate ftp client but believe me once you get away from it you really do wonder how you managed before, and I’ve spent the years since moving away nagging in their forums with many others asking for just this sort of feature, but the arrogance of their developers had meant I’d given hope but will sublime come to the rescue until such a feature exists these text editors are nothing more than notepad with pretty colours ( and some useful macros ) and are not serious development environments I’m having a look at total commander but can’t see a way to set it to automatically send files without any interaction, all I want to do is hit ctrl+s and then look at the results in a browser, in any other interaction is just clumsy and annoying.
#WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY PLUS#
Webdrive isn’t practical when you have to dip in and out of as many projects as I have to, plus I’ve still got to use an svn client and this would just litter the site with inappropriate files.
#WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY FULL#
I really don’t mind the switching to windows is just one shortcut away >.< besides I rather have a full blown very powerful file manager than sublime trying to do everything. But I like total commander because it can do exactly what you say, keep files locals and keep it sync on remote location.
#WINSCP SYNCHRONIZE DIRECTORIES AUTOMATICALLY SOFTWARE#
Have u tried software mentioned here? I did in the past when I didnt use total commander and they did their job good. I’ve been using dreamweaver and the only reason I still do is because of this, editing remote files is not a realistic option as I need to commit files to svn, I have long been searching for a simple text editor that supports projects in this way so I can get away from dreamweaver as it’s such a pig to use and it’s code colouring support is very weak, I use a dark theme but every so often it decides some parts of files are unrecognisable so it defaults back to black text making it unreadable on a dark background, where as sublime is good and hasn’t shown any of these characteristics What would be good is to have a project window file explorer within sublime, this can then be configured to match a remote destination, so all files are local, but can easily be transferred to the remote server without the need to switch windows, navigate multiple file paths, etc If it’s a plugin I’m all for it, built-in, no thx. WinSCP is a great program (I use totalcmd now for FTP tho), if a simple alt+tab or switching to it is too painful then I don’t really see how is a sublimetext problem but rather a user’s preference problem.Īnd Like you said, it just brings more bugs to the table I understand that, but I rather have sublime do 1 GREAT thing (powerful text editing) that try to do everything that others editors do and do it miserably, which is the case for many editors out there… It’s a surprisingly large amount of work to do it ‘right’. This opens up a whole mass of possible ‘file providers’, though – if jon writes FTP, why not WebDAV? Personally, if there were some custom interface available, I’d be tempted to do one for wikis, so that you could open a wiki page as a file. So, people would expect projects to index FTP servers, and auto-reload when a file changes on the FTP server, and so on. It’s a hairy area, because as soon as you add “File | Open FTP…” to a menu, people expect to be able to do everything they can do with local files with remote files. We’ve gone through something similar at work, where we provide the ability to read FTP and WebDAV as though they were local files. That said, driving it from winscp really isn’t a particular hardship, but having also used editors that do have it native, I can see the desire for it as an integrated feature. That would definitely be a more integrated, elegant way of opening remote files. The difference is not being able to use File | Open to open a remote file, which means you don’t need to switch out to winscp to find your file.
0 kommentar(er)
